Guessing game on where Cutler would go
Let’s just assume the Broncos are going to trade quarterback Jay Cutler. Where should he go, and what should the Broncos receive as compensation?
For starters, half the league ought to be clamoring for Cutler’s services. Last year, he threw for 25 touchdowns, set a franchise record with 4,526 passing yards and was voted to the Pro Bowl by his peers.
That was the good news. The bad news? Cutler was paired with an awful defense, an injury-riddled running game and as a result couldn’t lead the Broncos into the playoffs — even though the club had three chances to get it done in December.
Worst defense aside, you had a right to expect more from a Broncos offense that produced yards worthy of the league’s No. 2 ranking. The team ranked No. 2 in offensive yards ranked No. 16 in points.
I know, I know, the Broncos’ rushing game was limited by injuries, and without the running game, the Cutler-led offense suffered. OK, jot this down: The Broncos “hobbled” run game still ranked 12th among the league’s 32 teams.
You want to talk about quarterbacks missing a decent running attack? The Pittsburgh Steelers ranked No. 23 in rushing. Ben Roethlisberger helped them win the Super Bowl. The Arizona Cardinals ranked No. 32 in rushing. Kurt Warner led them to the Super Bowl.
The Steelers had an awesome defense. The Cardinals were one of only five teams (the Broncos included) to allow more than 400 points in 2008.
Someone spat out another stat recently, that Cutler has gone 13-1 in his career when the Broncos hold an opponent to 21 points or fewer. OK.
Matt Cassel, forced into a starting role for New England last year after Tom Brady went down with a season-ending injury, went 9-1 in games the Patriots held their opponents to 21 points or fewer.
My point is, just about any quarterback who plays behind a solid offense line and is paired with a decent run game and reliable receivers is likely to help produce wins if the opponent scores 21 points or fewer.
This isn’t to say Cassel is better than Cutler. But he might’ve put up similar numbers to Cutler if his offensive line in New England had been as solid as the wall Denver’s line constructed last season.
But Cassel, to the dismay of Broncos coach Josh McDaniels, has his starting gig in Kansas City. Cutler, who has issues with McDaniels, says he wants to play some place other than Denver.
So let’s spin the travel wheel.
Here are five scenarios, in no particular order of importance, that I believe will best benefit Cutler, his new team and the Broncos.
MINNESOTA VIKINGS: They made the playoffs last year with no stability at the quarterback position. Imagine Cutler in the same backfield as Adrian Peterson. It would be a devastating combination — like the Broncos’ glory pairing of John Elway and Terrell Davis. For starters, the Vikings would have to give up picks Nos. 22 and 54 overall. The Broncos ship Cutler and keep pick No. 12 overall.
Opens up bargaining possibilities.
DETROIT LIONS: They own two first-round picks — nice bargaining chips. Cutler and the 12th pick overall in exchange for picks Nos. 1 and 20 overall, giving Denver nice bargaining options for another trade — or selecting two quality players.
CAROLINA PANTHERS: Oh, boy. Here’s the deal — Cutler and a third-round pick (No. 79 overall) to the Panthers in exchange for defensive end Julius Peppers and quarterback Jake Delhomme. You get a 29-year-old Pro Bowl star defender in
Peppers and a 34-year-old quarterback in Delhomme — whose former quarterbacks coach at Carolina, Mike McCoy, now holds the title of offensive coordinator with the Broncos.
CLEVELAND BROWNS: The Browns have the No. 5 pick overall and a choice of young quarterbacks — Derek Anderson or Brady Quinn — to offer in return. Quinn still is unproven, and Anderson has been prone to injury. But either might be worth the gamble. The fifth pick overall should be an immediate impact player for the
defense.
ST. LOUIS RAMS: We’re calling the club that traded Denver its pick used to select Cutler in 2006. The Broncos send Cutler and the No. 12 pick to St. Louis in exchange for the No. 2 pick overall and 31-year-old quarterback Marc Bulger. You get a
proven veteran QB to play behind Denver’s solid offensive line — and improve your draft position by 10 slots.
What about the New York Jets, you ask? What about them? These are my top five. There are a number of teams that can improve their chances with Cutler at quarterback. Thing is, we’re just speculating until McDaniels and Cutler sort out their issues.
The Broncos, with or without Cutler, aren’t going to contend for a playoff berth this season without a vastly improved defense. The scheme has to improve and so does the personnel.
Cutler carries a load of potential. But shipping him elsewhere might be the Broncos’ best option to make a noticeable, if not dramatic change for the better on defense.
A lot of teams have proven that you don’t need a star quarterback to make the playoffs, let alone win once you get there.

Sam great column.
As I see it you pegged it right. Defense was the issue.
Note this:
In the games the Broncos lost they gave up
If the Broncos were 20th in defense in 2008 the would have allowed 5 points less per game. They still would have lost to K.C. by 4, Jacksonville by 6, New England by 16, Miami by 6, Oakland by 13, Carolina by 13, Buffalo -a tie and San Diego by 31.
Now check out your scenario of giving up 21 points per game. The Broncos would have lost six games and tied one. The Broncos would have been Division champs and gone to the playoffs. The Broncos would have lost to Jacksonville by 2, New England by 12, Miami by 2, Oakland by 9, Carolina by 9, San Diego by 27, tied K.C. and won against Buffalo by 4.
In 7 of 8 losses Denver was beaten in time of possession. In these eight games Denver was dominated by 47 minutes to just 7 minutes or 40 minutes overall.
In 7 out of the 8 losses Denver had fewer rushing yards.
In 4 out of 8 losses Denver gave up significant yards per rush to K.C. 6.5 yards, Jacksonville 5.7 yards, Oakland 6.8 yards, San Diego 7.7. In three wins the Broncos gave up significant yards per rush to San Diego 6.0 yards, Cleveland 5.5 yards, New York 7.5 yards. In eight games Denver had great difficulty stopping the run. I cannot see this 30 plus crowd of corner backs and free safeties in the defense making that great of a difference in stopping the run.
5 of Denver’s wins were by less than four points. One was an error in judgment by the ref.
Broncos Blog: http:ibelievethis.us/bronco’s/
I believe Cutlers value has been established as a first round pick this year, a first round next year and a pick of a player off of the roster. With Denver not giving up any draft picks just Cutler.
I believe there are several teams willing to give Denver that plus some. I don’t think the number one pick is something Denver wants, but I think the 20th and the 33rd pick plus a first rounder next year would be better.
The problem is who will be the quarter back next year if Cutler is gone. I think Denver should get what they can in Draft picks then make a deal for Brady Quinn.
Does anyone think about Mike Shannahan in this equation? Where might he go? He likes Cutler, I think.
I think that you are putting too much value in these high #1 slots. You have to think about the player you are giving up as it relates to the player(s) you are getting back.
Do you really think that Denver would really get equal value for pick #22 and #56? 22 last year was Felix Jones and 56 was Brian Brohm. Seems like the Vikings clean up on this one.
And the Detroit suggestion is just plain STOOPID! Give away a Pro Bowl QB for a player that is going to get big bucks with no experience and than give up our first to boot.
Dallas gave Detroit a 1st, 3rd and 6th for a #2 WR(Roy Williams). I would say that a Franchise QB is at least worth 2 to 3 times as much.
The Draft is a crap shoot. Would you trade your Jackpot Winning lottery ticket for 10 in the next drawing? I know I wouldn’t.
The Rams #2 and Bulger is not enough and definitely wouldn’t give them back the #12 pick.
The Vikings would have to throw in Greenway and those two picks.
Carolina needs to trade Peppers and a first for Cutler, end of story.
Cleveland trade reasonable but think they need to toss in a conditional pick.
Detroit trade works for both number 1 picks if can work a trade down for multiple picks from Philly.
Hello to all ! Great site. I am new here greetings to all from Poland.