Garfield County formally opposes Rulison ‘Path Forward’
Officials in Garfield County are determined to win compensation of some sort for landowners and holders of mineral rights in the area surrounding the Rulison nuclear test site in the western part of the county.
And, following a vote on Monday, the Board of County Commissioners is formally rejecting a plan the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has named the “Path Forward” for the site.
It was the predecessor of the DOE, called the Atomic Energy Commission, that in 1969 set off an atomic bomb some 8,400 feet below the surface in Rulison in an effort to free up gas fields trapped in the deep rock formations. Rulison is roughly five miles west of Rifle along Interstate 70.
The bomb, according to some estimates, was three times the size of the one dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, at the end of World War II, and the blast was part of a program intended to find peaceful uses for nuclear energy.
The gas at the site, however, was too radioactive to be useful, and the site has been capped and largely out of the public eye until recently. In 2003, the DOE established the Office of Legacy Management “to provide a long-term, sustainable solution to the legacy of the Cold War,” according to the DOE website.
At the same time, improved technology and rising prices for natural gas have sparked a boom in Garfield County and other parts of the country. Recently, drilling rigs have moved ever closer to a federally-controlled, half-mile patch of land directly above the blast zone where drilling has not been permitted.
The DOE’s Path Forward outlines a “staged approach” that, among other things, allows rigs to drill incrementally closer to that plot of land. The plan calls for testing of any gas recovered, to see if it is radioactive.
For the rest of the story visit, Garfield County formally opposes Rulison ‘Path Forward’ | PostIndependent.com
More from INDenverTimes
- Douglas County seeking ‘Super’ superintendent
- Carbondale group asking Garfield County to help stop possible drilling remote section
- DOE won’t oppose natural gas drilling closer to Rulison blast site
- Antero seeks to enlist royalty owners in debate over Garfield County drilling
- Kia Ora: A little history of New Zealand
The understanding at the time was that the improvement in gas flow from the blast was too low to justify the cost of the explosive device. Economics killed the path forward.
Someone, a true genius if ever there was one, decided to test the gas from the well BEFORE the blast. Natural radioactivity was significantly above background and totally safe.
The radioactivity after the test was not significantly greater. The radioactivity from the blast was trapped in the melted rock in the cavity formed.
Let us follow all the facts.
The concept that the radioactive gas is trapped in what was molten rock is incorrect. By the DOE’s own admission it is unsafe to drill in Lot 11, the 40 acre tract where the bomb was detonated. There are questions of safety by independent experts (Dr. G. Thyne of CSM and U of Wyo), who believe the radioactive contamination was pushed out into the fractures that were produced by the affects of a 43 KT nuclear explosion. The Office of Legacy Management who oversees the sight, can only speculate, also called ‘guess’, as to where the radioactivity may be–drilling and hydrofracturing in this area can open pathways to the surface and to the water sources in this alluvial valley which serve population areas downstream of the site. Given these possible adverse affects, why would anyone take risks associated by any mineral development in this area, when there is a glut of gas for the taking in areas without the serious adverse affects of nuclear byproducts.