<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danger to humans seen in discovery of Ebola virus in pigs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs</link>
	<description>INDenverTimes provides news, insight, perspective and information for Denver and Colorado</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Weller</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/comment-page-1/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21938#comment-7224</guid>
		<description>No, the story says that up to now this version of ebola hadn&#039;t been found in humans, although it had been found in non-human primates, now it has. No confirmed fatalities yet. But there have been sporadic outbreaks of ebola in remote areas with fatalities. the scientists wonder if ebola R could have been involved. To assume that although it has spread to humans but will not kill them is a very dangerous assumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the story says that up to now this version of ebola hadn&#8217;t been found in humans, although it had been found in non-human primates, now it has. No confirmed fatalities yet. But there have been sporadic outbreaks of ebola in remote areas with fatalities. the scientists wonder if ebola R could have been involved. To assume that although it has spread to humans but will not kill them is a very dangerous assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worg</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/comment-page-1/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>worg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21938#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>aggie: Ebola Reston is very closely related to Ebola Zaire and Marburg, diseases that kill 90% of humans infected.

Ebola Reston is AIRBORNE.

Ebola Reston in pigs might very well geneswap with influenza.

You were saying what again about ignorance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aggie: Ebola Reston is very closely related to Ebola Zaire and Marburg, diseases that kill 90% of humans infected.</p>
<p>Ebola Reston is AIRBORNE.</p>
<p>Ebola Reston in pigs might very well geneswap with influenza.</p>
<p>You were saying what again about ignorance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Aggie</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/comment-page-1/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Aggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21938#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the article first says that this is different from Ebola in humans and then goes on to talk about how awful Ebola is.  It&#039;s also different from rabies and botulism, but those are awful diseases, too.  So whoopdidoo.  This is the reason that scientists get so frustrated with the ignorance shown by reporters in their articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the article first says that this is different from Ebola in humans and then goes on to talk about how awful Ebola is.  It&#8217;s also different from rabies and botulism, but those are awful diseases, too.  So whoopdidoo.  This is the reason that scientists get so frustrated with the ignorance shown by reporters in their articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porkfat</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/comment-page-1/#comment-7213</link>
		<dc:creator>porkfat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21938#comment-7213</guid>
		<description>scritch: do those come in the packages you get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scritch: do those come in the packages you get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scritch</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/danger-to-humans-seen-in-discovery-of-ebola-virus-in-pigs/comment-page-1/#comment-7212</link>
		<dc:creator>scritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21938#comment-7212</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it.  I&#039;m not eating any more pigs that are bleeding from the eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it.  I&#8217;m not eating any more pigs that are bleeding from the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

