<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill O&#8217;Reilly: Off the wall &#8212; race and Michael Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson</link>
	<description>INDenverTimes provides news, insight, perspective and information for Denver and Colorado</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>You know I watched the OReilly tape, and I did not see as much in it as you indicate is in there.  Jackson of 93 was a troubled character.  I listened to an interview with the Dermatologist, who with no reason to lie, stated that the boy in the 93 case accuractely described the variations in Jackson&#039;s genital area.  In this case we are talking about a grown man and a young boy, not two consenting adults, hence Jackson&#039;s swift and sudden fall from grace.

I also saw Geraldo stand up for Jackson as being a loving and caring father who was the primary care giver to his children and categorically state that the 2001 case was pure trumped up charges.  This was also presented on OReilly&#039;s show so he did present multiple facets on what must have been a troubled man.  

In the end, as in any good Greek Trajedy, Michael&#039;s skills seem to have bought more happiness and joy for others than they ever accomplished for himself.  He died deeply in debt, in a rented house paid for by the tour promoter that now stands to make even more off of his death if they get the family to carry out the concerts.

Given all of the money Jackson made, why did he end up so far in dept -- I have heard numbers in the $400 to $450 million dollar range?  Was this a case of juvinille ecentrincies coming out, or was merely the failure of Michael to obtain appropriate financial investment advice.  This is a serious issue as when you are playing with that type of money you always raise the spectre of murder.  To this day, I have trouble reconciling whether it was a sophisticated hit, or merely a suicide/run down body failure.  

I think that these questions will be with us until we get to the other side, and Michel fills us in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I watched the OReilly tape, and I did not see as much in it as you indicate is in there.  Jackson of 93 was a troubled character.  I listened to an interview with the Dermatologist, who with no reason to lie, stated that the boy in the 93 case accuractely described the variations in Jackson&#8217;s genital area.  In this case we are talking about a grown man and a young boy, not two consenting adults, hence Jackson&#8217;s swift and sudden fall from grace.</p>
<p>I also saw Geraldo stand up for Jackson as being a loving and caring father who was the primary care giver to his children and categorically state that the 2001 case was pure trumped up charges.  This was also presented on OReilly&#8217;s show so he did present multiple facets on what must have been a troubled man.  </p>
<p>In the end, as in any good Greek Trajedy, Michael&#8217;s skills seem to have bought more happiness and joy for others than they ever accomplished for himself.  He died deeply in debt, in a rented house paid for by the tour promoter that now stands to make even more off of his death if they get the family to carry out the concerts.</p>
<p>Given all of the money Jackson made, why did he end up so far in dept &#8212; I have heard numbers in the $400 to $450 million dollar range?  Was this a case of juvinille ecentrincies coming out, or was merely the failure of Michael to obtain appropriate financial investment advice.  This is a serious issue as when you are playing with that type of money you always raise the spectre of murder.  To this day, I have trouble reconciling whether it was a sophisticated hit, or merely a suicide/run down body failure.  </p>
<p>I think that these questions will be with us until we get to the other side, and Michel fills us in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>Lloyd, I am not saying Sammy Davis was not popular or a cross over artist, but Jackson was more mainstream.  Davis was still overshadowed by other icons, while Jackson was the biggest star in the music business.  Jackson&#039;s legacy spread to other countries around the world, I don&#039;t remember youth in Japan and Germany imitating the Sammy Davis look like they did with Jackson.  Jazz music and motown where great foundations for Black music to spread racial barriers, but it was not until Jackson that a black artist became mainstream in American culture.

But this popularity discussion is a sideshow to what my main point on this article was.  I believe it is despicable for the likes of oreilly to question this man&#039;s place in history and to question his black identity.  Mr O misleads conspiracy as it were fact, and furthermore he is blind to the impact of Jackson&#039;s contributions through music and popular culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd, I am not saying Sammy Davis was not popular or a cross over artist, but Jackson was more mainstream.  Davis was still overshadowed by other icons, while Jackson was the biggest star in the music business.  Jackson&#8217;s legacy spread to other countries around the world, I don&#8217;t remember youth in Japan and Germany imitating the Sammy Davis look like they did with Jackson.  Jazz music and motown where great foundations for Black music to spread racial barriers, but it was not until Jackson that a black artist became mainstream in American culture.</p>
<p>But this popularity discussion is a sideshow to what my main point on this article was.  I believe it is despicable for the likes of oreilly to question this man&#8217;s place in history and to question his black identity.  Mr O misleads conspiracy as it were fact, and furthermore he is blind to the impact of Jackson&#8217;s contributions through music and popular culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>David,

Perhaps it may be because you were not there, but to say that a fellow like Sammy Davis Jr. was not a successful cross over is ignorant of history.  Start with the environment he came up in.  I can remember when Mr. Davis was allowed to perform on the strip, but then was &quot;politely&quot; asked to go over to the Moulin Rouge in North Las Vegas to stay and party after the show.  He notes how Sinatra invited him over for some drinks, and he showed up and sat at the table, only black face in the place.  Then Joey Bishop and a couple of others came to his table because Frank and them wanted to see if he had the guts to move forward.  That is how he joined the Rat Pack.

Musically he was a crooner like Sinatra, but he also showed up on the Rock/Pop charts with songs like the Candy Man.  He was a talented dancer who branched out into choreography, though he never did get around to the moon walk.  As an actor, Sammy appeared on numerous TV shows, and several movies including both dramatic and comedy roles.  While it is true that his record sales did not come close to matching Jackson&#039;s; it is strongly arguable that his acceptance into multiple facets of society greatly exceeded Micheal&#039;s.  

I chose the Robeson example because in the 1950&#039;s Communist&#039;s in America were perhaps even less popular than child molesters are today.  Remember that this was the age of the Red Scare and far from denying he was a Communist, Robeson was preaching it&#039;s values.  I have no desire to make a martyr of him, but the fact is this caused him a large chunk of his career.  The man also had a god given talent of one of the richest bass voices we have ever had.  Some folks felt that they wanted to keep buying records showcasing that talent.  More folks felt that there were other talents that did not come with so much baggage and stopped purchasing his records.  

Isn&#039;t what happened with Robeson similar to what happened with Jackson?  There was no Conservitive Talk Radio or TV back then, but if so, &quot;mindless&quot; conservitives such as myself would have probably made points about Robeson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Perhaps it may be because you were not there, but to say that a fellow like Sammy Davis Jr. was not a successful cross over is ignorant of history.  Start with the environment he came up in.  I can remember when Mr. Davis was allowed to perform on the strip, but then was &#8220;politely&#8221; asked to go over to the Moulin Rouge in North Las Vegas to stay and party after the show.  He notes how Sinatra invited him over for some drinks, and he showed up and sat at the table, only black face in the place.  Then Joey Bishop and a couple of others came to his table because Frank and them wanted to see if he had the guts to move forward.  That is how he joined the Rat Pack.</p>
<p>Musically he was a crooner like Sinatra, but he also showed up on the Rock/Pop charts with songs like the Candy Man.  He was a talented dancer who branched out into choreography, though he never did get around to the moon walk.  As an actor, Sammy appeared on numerous TV shows, and several movies including both dramatic and comedy roles.  While it is true that his record sales did not come close to matching Jackson&#8217;s; it is strongly arguable that his acceptance into multiple facets of society greatly exceeded Micheal&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>I chose the Robeson example because in the 1950&#8242;s Communist&#8217;s in America were perhaps even less popular than child molesters are today.  Remember that this was the age of the Red Scare and far from denying he was a Communist, Robeson was preaching it&#8217;s values.  I have no desire to make a martyr of him, but the fact is this caused him a large chunk of his career.  The man also had a god given talent of one of the richest bass voices we have ever had.  Some folks felt that they wanted to keep buying records showcasing that talent.  More folks felt that there were other talents that did not come with so much baggage and stopped purchasing his records.  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t what happened with Robeson similar to what happened with Jackson?  There was no Conservitive Talk Radio or TV back then, but if so, &#8220;mindless&#8221; conservitives such as myself would have probably made points about Robeson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>No you got it all wrong, my friend.  They are not equal, but they are both despicable none the less.  That&#039;s like disavowing an illegal act, such as selling marijuana because there is a difference between slinging mary j and crack.   A guy like O&#039;reilly has no bounds to judge someone that was not charged of no wrong doing (just accusations) as he is someone that was accused of a similar, not equal, but similar proceeding in the law.  More importantly, People like O&#039;reilly who value the American system of law should respect courts decisions, he can disagree but stating the otherwise as if where a fact is wrong for a guy who claims to be a journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you got it all wrong, my friend.  They are not equal, but they are both despicable none the less.  That&#8217;s like disavowing an illegal act, such as selling marijuana because there is a difference between slinging mary j and crack.   A guy like O&#8217;reilly has no bounds to judge someone that was not charged of no wrong doing (just accusations) as he is someone that was accused of a similar, not equal, but similar proceeding in the law.  More importantly, People like O&#8217;reilly who value the American system of law should respect courts decisions, he can disagree but stating the otherwise as if where a fact is wrong for a guy who claims to be a journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReasonableArt</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>ReasonableArt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7222</guid>
		<description>david gee,

   you must not seen many differences between sexual relations with a adult and sexual relations with childrens of youth. one was accused of things with adults the other with things with children yet you talk of them as equal.


art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david gee,</p>
<p>   you must not seen many differences between sexual relations with a adult and sexual relations with childrens of youth. one was accused of things with adults the other with things with children yet you talk of them as equal.</p>
<p>art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7218</guid>
		<description>Good analysis.  I still disagree.  Those motown artists you mentioned did get airtime, but they did not cross over as much as Jackson did and they were not as innovative as Jackson (dance, videos, pop revolution, record sales).  I am glad that you are aware that Jackson is an icon in mist of his flaws, O&#039;reilly some how doesn&#039;t understand that.  You mentioned that 15 million dollar settlement in 1991.  How much did O&#039;reilly pay for his settlement for sexual harassment?  Under that logic, O&#039;reilly is a perverted snide individual who is obviously guilty due to his settlement.  I don&#039;t think O&#039;reilly should be preaching to us about morals and judging the flaws of others when he is in fact a troubled man himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis.  I still disagree.  Those motown artists you mentioned did get airtime, but they did not cross over as much as Jackson did and they were not as innovative as Jackson (dance, videos, pop revolution, record sales).  I am glad that you are aware that Jackson is an icon in mist of his flaws, O&#8217;reilly some how doesn&#8217;t understand that.  You mentioned that 15 million dollar settlement in 1991.  How much did O&#8217;reilly pay for his settlement for sexual harassment?  Under that logic, O&#8217;reilly is a perverted snide individual who is obviously guilty due to his settlement.  I don&#8217;t think O&#8217;reilly should be preaching to us about morals and judging the flaws of others when he is in fact a troubled man himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7215</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7215</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Reilly makes some serious points that those who came to adulthood in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s will understand.

First, Jackson was by no means the first true cross over artist.  How about Louis Armstrong whose What a Wonderful World is still getting airtime today on several different types of stations, years after his death?  Black, White?  Both seemed to like his music.  

Then their was Paul Robeson with songs like &quot;Old Man River&quot;?  This conservitive listens to his wonderful voice even though he was an ardent proponent of Communism whose political views were even too liberal for the NAACP.  However, it is undeniable, that he was one of the agitators in breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball thereby opening up a whole new vista for literaly thousands of youths.  Unfortunately, this would be a false dream for all too many who put all their hopes in this basket, but that was not Robeson&#039;s fault.  Finally, Robeson, because of his International Fame, took a leading role in correctly branding lynching as Genocide, even though it cost him professionally and forced travel restrictions on him in the 50s.  

Given these relative amounts of service to the Black Communities, it is a little suprising when one considers that few Black leaders risked showing up at Robeson&#039;s funeral in 1976.  

Other early cross over entertainers would need to include the likes of Sammy Davis Jr., Flip Wilson, and of course Dr. William Cosby.  

The dam was permanently shattered when Barry Gord;y started Motown.  There was such a large stable of stars coming out of Motown that any list will be partial -- Marvin Gaye, the Supremes, the Temptations, Stevie Wonder, Matha and the Vandalas, Four Tops, Gladys Knight and the Pips, Isley Brothers, Rare Earth, Tammy Terrell, Mary Wells, and some unknown group called the Jackson 5.  Barry Gordy&#039;s instincts were the sledge hammer that broke down a large part of the wall for good.

Finally, in 1993 Mr. Jackson did have a severe problem with the kid.  Nobody pays $15 million unless they are forced into paying the money.  As noted, Mr. Jackson did have a splotchy skin pattern, one correctly described by the boy regarding Jackson&#039; genitals.  I do not think that the recent charge had the same credibility, but there is no mistaking the earlier one, and it put a giant crimp in Jackson&#039;s career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Reilly makes some serious points that those who came to adulthood in the 60&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s will understand.</p>
<p>First, Jackson was by no means the first true cross over artist.  How about Louis Armstrong whose What a Wonderful World is still getting airtime today on several different types of stations, years after his death?  Black, White?  Both seemed to like his music.  </p>
<p>Then their was Paul Robeson with songs like &#8220;Old Man River&#8221;?  This conservitive listens to his wonderful voice even though he was an ardent proponent of Communism whose political views were even too liberal for the NAACP.  However, it is undeniable, that he was one of the agitators in breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball thereby opening up a whole new vista for literaly thousands of youths.  Unfortunately, this would be a false dream for all too many who put all their hopes in this basket, but that was not Robeson&#8217;s fault.  Finally, Robeson, because of his International Fame, took a leading role in correctly branding lynching as Genocide, even though it cost him professionally and forced travel restrictions on him in the 50s.  </p>
<p>Given these relative amounts of service to the Black Communities, it is a little suprising when one considers that few Black leaders risked showing up at Robeson&#8217;s funeral in 1976.  </p>
<p>Other early cross over entertainers would need to include the likes of Sammy Davis Jr., Flip Wilson, and of course Dr. William Cosby.  </p>
<p>The dam was permanently shattered when Barry Gord;y started Motown.  There was such a large stable of stars coming out of Motown that any list will be partial &#8212; Marvin Gaye, the Supremes, the Temptations, Stevie Wonder, Matha and the Vandalas, Four Tops, Gladys Knight and the Pips, Isley Brothers, Rare Earth, Tammy Terrell, Mary Wells, and some unknown group called the Jackson 5.  Barry Gordy&#8217;s instincts were the sledge hammer that broke down a large part of the wall for good.</p>
<p>Finally, in 1993 Mr. Jackson did have a severe problem with the kid.  Nobody pays $15 million unless they are forced into paying the money.  As noted, Mr. Jackson did have a splotchy skin pattern, one correctly described by the boy regarding Jackson&#8217; genitals.  I do not think that the recent charge had the same credibility, but there is no mistaking the earlier one, and it put a giant crimp in Jackson&#8217;s career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7209</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7209</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t mind reading a center-right independent guy like O&#039;Reilly for a change. 
I used to have to put up with Mike Littwin. Thank god that is over with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t mind reading a center-right independent guy like O&#8217;Reilly for a change.<br />
I used to have to put up with Mike Littwin. Thank god that is over with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bea Shepard</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>Bea Shepard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7207</guid>
		<description>I paid for this news service to be able to read the writers and columnists of the Rocky, not to watch you buy columns from O&#039;Reilly.  If I want O&#039;Reilly, I&#039;ll get him on TV.  I was hoping my money was helping to support local news people, not someone who really doesn&#039;t need it, because, believe me, I don&#039;t have it to throw around.  If you continue to buy material instead of hacking it out yourselves, you&#039;ll have a much harder time getting me to renew with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I paid for this news service to be able to read the writers and columnists of the Rocky, not to watch you buy columns from O&#8217;Reilly.  If I want O&#8217;Reilly, I&#8217;ll get him on TV.  I was hoping my money was helping to support local news people, not someone who really doesn&#8217;t need it, because, believe me, I don&#8217;t have it to throw around.  If you continue to buy material instead of hacking it out yourselves, you&#8217;ll have a much harder time getting me to renew with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G</title>
		<link>http://www.indenvertimes.com/bill-oreilly-off-the-wall-race-and-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-7204</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indenvertimes.com/?p=21909#comment-7204</guid>
		<description>O&#039;reilly is so naive and ignorant in regards to race and its impact on society.  His commentary is downright disgusting and troubling in the wake of the death of an American icon.  This cretin, O&#039;reilly is framing Jackson under assumptions and misleading accusations.  He infers that Jackson is not an African American icon because &#039;he bleached his skin white&#039; and that he adopted white children and further alludes that Jackson is some kind of sell out?  If the halfwitted O&#039;reilly really cared about informing his idiotic audience he would of checked his facts.  If the vile Oreilly reported accurately he would of reported that Jackson &#039;bleached&#039; his skin in response to his DISEASE, Vitiligo.  Without skin therapy, Jackson&#039;s appearance would of been abnormal and bizarre with dark and white spots,  But instead O&#039;reilly smears a victim of Vitiligo to be a self hating African American.  And then there are the kids of Mr Jackson.  O&#039;reilly indicates that if a black man has biracial children or adopts white children that he is somehow a self hating racist???  Who cares who his children are.  Many families are biracial or adopt children of other races, and there is nothing wrong with that.  The facts indicate that we do not know anything about Jackson&#039;s children.  We don&#039;t know if Jackson is the father any better than if we know if Oreilly is the father of his children.  It&#039;s all speculation and the distasteful Oreilly comes to his idiotic conclusion based on the appearance of his children.  And finally for O&#039;reilly to report that Jackson is not an icon or a AFRICAN AMERMICAN HERO is disrespectful and dishonest.  His legacy in music and American culture transcends his bizarre behavior, surgeries, awkward appearance, or the accusations of child molestation of which he was never found guilty.  By the way if we are going to judge people on accusations, How do we judge mr Oreilly, the guy who sexually harassed one of his female producers??  But anyway Michael Jackson&#039;s music was about breaking down social barriers and united people through music and dance.  He was one of the first Black artists to be popular among all demographics, unless you are a republican as statistics indicate that only 33% (including o&#039;reilly) like the man&#039;s music.  He was also the first Black artist to get airtime on Mtv.  He sold the most records for an album in history.  He innovated music videos as we know them to today.  He also helped those in need through charity, more than oreilly could ever imagine.  There is no question, Mr Jackson&#039;s contribution through music is epic and has broke down racial barriers, and he is therefore an American icon and hero. If anything Oreilly should of portrayed him as a tragic hero.  However oreilly is despicable and should of never opened his mouth on this issue...As a catholic myself I am ashamed of Oreilly who claims to be catholic.  Whatever happened to not judging others and boosting about one&#039;s self???  He is a political hack and an hateful person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;reilly is so naive and ignorant in regards to race and its impact on society.  His commentary is downright disgusting and troubling in the wake of the death of an American icon.  This cretin, O&#8217;reilly is framing Jackson under assumptions and misleading accusations.  He infers that Jackson is not an African American icon because &#8216;he bleached his skin white&#8217; and that he adopted white children and further alludes that Jackson is some kind of sell out?  If the halfwitted O&#8217;reilly really cared about informing his idiotic audience he would of checked his facts.  If the vile Oreilly reported accurately he would of reported that Jackson &#8216;bleached&#8217; his skin in response to his DISEASE, Vitiligo.  Without skin therapy, Jackson&#8217;s appearance would of been abnormal and bizarre with dark and white spots,  But instead O&#8217;reilly smears a victim of Vitiligo to be a self hating African American.  And then there are the kids of Mr Jackson.  O&#8217;reilly indicates that if a black man has biracial children or adopts white children that he is somehow a self hating racist???  Who cares who his children are.  Many families are biracial or adopt children of other races, and there is nothing wrong with that.  The facts indicate that we do not know anything about Jackson&#8217;s children.  We don&#8217;t know if Jackson is the father any better than if we know if Oreilly is the father of his children.  It&#8217;s all speculation and the distasteful Oreilly comes to his idiotic conclusion based on the appearance of his children.  And finally for O&#8217;reilly to report that Jackson is not an icon or a AFRICAN AMERMICAN HERO is disrespectful and dishonest.  His legacy in music and American culture transcends his bizarre behavior, surgeries, awkward appearance, or the accusations of child molestation of which he was never found guilty.  By the way if we are going to judge people on accusations, How do we judge mr Oreilly, the guy who sexually harassed one of his female producers??  But anyway Michael Jackson&#8217;s music was about breaking down social barriers and united people through music and dance.  He was one of the first Black artists to be popular among all demographics, unless you are a republican as statistics indicate that only 33% (including o&#8217;reilly) like the man&#8217;s music.  He was also the first Black artist to get airtime on Mtv.  He sold the most records for an album in history.  He innovated music videos as we know them to today.  He also helped those in need through charity, more than oreilly could ever imagine.  There is no question, Mr Jackson&#8217;s contribution through music is epic and has broke down racial barriers, and he is therefore an American icon and hero. If anything Oreilly should of portrayed him as a tragic hero.  However oreilly is despicable and should of never opened his mouth on this issue&#8230;As a catholic myself I am ashamed of Oreilly who claims to be catholic.  Whatever happened to not judging others and boosting about one&#8217;s self???  He is a political hack and an hateful person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

